World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Xuân Thủy National Park

Article Id: WHEBN0026771191
Reproduction Date:

Title: Xuân Thủy National Park  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Protected areas of Vietnam, List of national parks of Vietnam, Vũ Quang National Park, Xuân Sơn National Park, Hoàng Liên National Park
Collection:
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Xuân Thủy National Park

Xuân Thủy National Park
IUCN category II (national park)
Mangrove forests of Xuân Thủy National Park
Map showing the location of Xuân Thủy National Park
Map showing the location of Xuân Thủy National Park
Location in Vietnam
Location northern Vietnam
Nearest city Nam Định, Thái Bình
Coordinates
Area 71,00 km²
Established 2003
Governing body People's Committee province of Nam Định

Xuân Thủy National Park (Vietnamese: Vườn quốc gia Xuân Thủy ) is a national park in Hong River Biosphere Reserve in Nam Định Province, Vietnam. The national park was established according to the Decision number 01/2003/QĐ-TTg dated 2 January 2003 signed by premier Nguyễn Tấn Dũng, this decision turned Xuân Thủy Wetland Nature Reserve into Xuân Thủy National Park. The park was the first wetland area to be announced a Ramsar site in south-east Asia and is internationally significant as a migratory bird habitat.

History

On 2 January 1989, the area of 12,000 hectare around the mouth of the [1]

Office Xuân Thủy National Park

Landscape and climate

Landscape

Xuân Thủy National Park is located in Giao Thủy District (Nam Định Province), 150 km south-east from Hanoi. It is the largest coastal wetland ecosystem in the north of Vietnam and placed in the south of the Red River mouth.[2] The Core Zone has a total area of 7.100 hectares, 4000 hectares of low tide wetlands and 3.100 hectares of land.[3] It covers the islets of Con Ngan, Con Lu and Con Xanh. Aquaculture farms and some parts of mangrove forest cover the largest islet, Con Ngan. Con Lu islet is covered by sandy areas as such as alluvial flats and aquaculture farms. Con Lu, which is the smallest of the three islets is being widened by alluvium from the Red River and covered by sandy layer.[4] The Buffer Zone has a total area of 8.000 hectares. The Park is a delta and estuary islands (Ba Lat river-mouth) support coastal mangroves and the mud flat ecosystem in the Red River delta. The area includes land enclosed by sea dikes with fringing marshes. ‘The land is also noted for the human ecological model of VAC (model of planting vegetable gardens, rasing fish in ponds and animal husbandry all in one home) and silvofishery models. The area has a long history of wet rice cultivation as well as dike construction and land reclamation’[5]

Climate

Giao Thuy district lies in the tropical monsoon region, which has two distinct seasons. One hot and rainy season from April to October and a cold and dry season from November to March. The annual average temperature is 24 °C. The highest temperature in summer is 40.3 °C and the coldest temperature in winter is 6.8 °C. The average humidity is 84%. The annual rainfall is between 1700 mm and 1800 mm. Averagely there are 133 rainy days per year. Rain mainly falls in summer or winter. With 15-18 rainy days August is the month with the most rainfall in contrast to autumn and winter with the lowest rainfall (25–50 mm per month). From July to October the Red River is flooded, which influences the region as well as the northeast monsoon. In winter the wind mainly comes from the north and in summer from the east. July and August seem to be the stormiest months in the year where storms are followed by heavy rain. Three strong storms hit the north of Vietnam in 2005 (28 July one wind with level 7, 18 September with level 9 and on 28 September with level 12). There are two types of soil formed from the alluvium of the Red River. One is alluvial mud (which becomes loam) and one is sand. Transported by water the alluvial forms the coastal soil like light soil (sand and light loam and pure sand), medium soil and heavy soil (loam and clay).[6]

Biological characteristics

Fauna

Black-faced spoonbill

Xuân Thủy National Park is a staging and wintering area for shorebirds, gulls and waterfowl in the coastal zone of the Red River Delta. The National Park is a living space for 250 species of birds (150 migratory and 50 water bird species) from 41 families and 13 orders. 9 species are designated as endangered in the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species for example the Spoon-billed Sandpiper and Nordmann's Greenshank.[7] 65- 75 Black-faced Spoonbill – who were chosen to be the symbol of Xuân Thủy National Park - are seen in the migratory season. The total number of Black-faced Spoonbill in the world are about 1000, it shows that 5% of the whole population of the species are living in Xuân Thủy National Park during the winter season. The park also provides a habitat for other rare animal species. These includes species of otter, porpoise and whale. Furthermore it has 30 species of reptiles and an uncounted number of different insects.

Flora

In Xuân Thủy National Park are 120 species of vascular plants (20 of which thrive particularly well in the wetland habitat). The mangrove forest helps stabilizing the alluvial soil as well as functioning as flood protection and playing an important role in different biochemical cycles. 111 aquatic plant species have been recorded. Certain species of seaweed in particular are of high economic value. Over 500 species of benthos and zooplankton (shrimp, fish, crab, oysters etc.) have also been identified.

Nature conservation activities

In Xuân Thủy National Park's Core Zone there is a portion of unoccupied land used for shrimp-rearing ponds (about 19 extensive farming ponds near the Red River) and extensive clam rearing areas (a part of the sandy plain near the end of Con Ngan). Tents and huts pitched to look after such ponds were built without planning. The land in the Buffer Zone can be divided into several categories including residential land, agricultural farming land, aquaculture land, mangroves and flats and a few mangrove areas along the river canals.

Most of the areas in Bai Trong and Con Ngan, Xuân Thủy's buffer zone, have been divided into ponds to raise shrimps and crabs. This activity grew exponentially in the 1990s. The culturing season is May to January (April to December lunar calendar). During the off season some local people culture yellow thread seaweed for commercial purposes. Hunting of birds and other animals is prohibited and has decreased. Nevertheless such illegal activities are still present. It is also forbidden for the farmers to graze their buffaloes in the Core Zone.[8]

To prevent the over-exploitation of the given natural resources, there are projects like the Mushroom Club which aim to create alternative livelihoods. Also, the National Park has the task to raise awareness in the communities of the Buffer Zone to care about the environment and to protect it on a long-term basis. To achieve this goal, the National Park started some educational activities which include annual lessons in nine local secondary schools. In the future there will also be a project concerning the solid waste management in the Buffer Zone; at the moment, waste is not separated and simply thrown away.

Scientific research

Since it is a very important natural site in Southeast Asia, Xuân Thủy National Park has been subject to many both Vietnamese and international scientific researches. According to the National Park, there have been written more than 10 conservation of environment or to sustainable development.

Grazing buffalos in corezone were a big problem since they destroyed the mangrove forest
After the banishment of all buffalos the forest is slowly regenerating.

Especially in the Core Zone there are many projects regarding conservation as there is no human activity allowed in this area. The aim is to protect the mangroves, migratory birds, other aquatic and terrestrial species and the wetland ecosystem in its entirety. In the Buffer Zone the focus of scientific research lies on the development of sustainable and environmentally friendly alternative livelihoods and the promotion of environmental protection. Also there is still the need to find mechanisms which end fights between local interests and the park policies. Projects concerning the co-management of clamp culture are a first step to solving those problems. In the whole area there are also projects which focus on building capacity both for the staff of the National Park and for the local community to reduce the current pressure on the natural resources of the park. One problem of any scientific research concerning the park is the missing long-term basis. Most of the projects are conducted by outsiders who sometimes fail to meet the given needs. Furthermore there is no database in the National Park which collects all research that is ever made so that a lot of basic information needs to be collected repeatedly.

Socioeconomic background

Overview

traditional fisherboats near the mouth of the red river

According to statistic data of the Giao Thủy District People's Committee from the year 2005, there are 47.123 inhabitants living in the five Buffer Zone Communes (Giao Thien, Giao An, Giao Lac, Giao Xuan and Giao Hai) belonging to the National Park. The average density of population varies between 1,023 and 1,331 people per square kilometer, due to more than one percent population growth every year it is still rising. The local inhabitants earn most of their income by agricultural activities, mainly by cultivating rice. 39.3% of the average income is gained this way, the productivity being 632 kg rice per capita per annum. Because of unfavourable changes in nature, agricultural land is shrinking year by year, creating a lack of land for agricultural production extension. While this economic field has therefore reached its capacities, the second most important one still is seen to have a high potential: In 2007, fisheries came up for 36.1% of a family’s income, there were 1,800 hectare of aquaculture ponds in the Buffer Zone. With the annual growth rate of the marine business being 14.9%, this sector is in fast expansion and is seen to have a higher economic turnover than traditional agriculture. On the other side, clam-rearing for example can have a high financial return, but also needs big investments and puts a high pressure on the environment. As the water quality is endangered, it can be seen that some aquacultural ponds stop making any profit after some years and put the owner into a very difficult financial situation.[10]

veterinarian network at its present status is not capable of dealing with major diseases, a further increase in this sector is not possible. New industries and techniques belonging to the sector of services and trade meet a high demand and have a big potential for the future, now making up only 14.6% of the average income. The field of industry and handicraft is underdeveloped and only responsible for 5%; the reasons for this can be found in missing education and a poor material base.[11]

The labour source is structured according to the average income: 78.6% of all inhabitants are working in the sector of agriculture, 16.2% in fisheries, 2% in fields of trading and services and 3.2% in the sector of industry, handicraft and construction. It can be seen that the sector of fisheries is more profitable than traditional agriculture, it is also a more stable employment: people working on the rice fields are unemployed between the two harvests, creating more pressure on the resources of the National Park by exploiting its resources in this time. The general rate of unemployment declined from 8.26% to 6.51% in the period from 2001 to 2005, but since 96.8% of all residents in the Buffer Zone grow their own rice, a high number of workers depends on the agricultural season.

In Xuân Thủy District there are 8510 primary and secondary school students and 1187 high school students. While every child goes to primary school and 95% also visit the secondary school, the number of high school students is still very low. Also, in 2003 only 5% of all inhabitants were trained labourers.[12]

Furthermore there are still problems caused by the poor infrastructure. All the residents have electricity, but the water supply manly still relies on collected rain water since half of the inhabitants use drilled wells and driven wells, but only 20 to 30% of those have clean water. The low living standard and infrastructure also can be seen as the reason for the unstable and spontaneous production and the missing knowledge and experience of market business, which also causes economic difficulties.

Because there is no possibility of further increasing agriculture and the number of inhabitants is rising, the pressure on the resources of the National Park is growing. Besides the investment in level of poverty which still lies between 10 and 15%, alternative livelihoods must be created and supported.[13]

Alternative livelihoods

In order to create alternative income generating sources, to reduce the pressure on the natural resources of the National Park and to generate sustainable employment-possibilities, there are different projects for the Buffer Zone. It is hoped that the human encroachment on the environment can be decreased, this way solving some of the most severe problems like deforestation, the use of small net fishing, by-catch fishing and electric fishing, uncontrollable shrimp pond making and illegal hunting.

The focus of the program to create alternative livelihoods lies on guaranteeing technical and financial support in cooperation with numerous local and international organizations (both governmental and non-governmental), some of the most important ones being MCD, CORiN-ASIA and the Wetlands Alliance Program (WAP). On the financial level the park mainly invests in the local infrastructure building for example roads, a community center of environmental education and public health centers. The goal of gaining awareness on ecological issues and creating a sustainable development mainly is tried to reach by technology support. The transfer of technology to the local population includes the teaching of techniques to grow mushrooms, keep bees and maintain extensive shrimp farms. Because it is seen as an extremely effective service sector, community-based ecotourism is stimulated.

The main office building of Xuân Thủy National Park.
Mushroom Club founded by Xuân Thủy National Park

The project of the Mushroom Club started in 2008. Before, grazing buffaloes in the Core Zone were a major problem as they were destroying the forest. The fight between the Park policies and local interests was tried to solve by creating mushroom culture as an alternative livelihood. With the support of CORiN-ASIA and WAP the Xuân Thủy National Park Mushroom Club was established.[14] This way not only jobs regardless of gender and age were created, the very common open field rice straw burning was also reduced since the straw is now used as organic fertilizer in agriculture. After one year the Mushroom Club had 78 members who not only worked together but also started to organize small social events like the Mushroom cooking contest for the health of the community.

In November 2010 the project is an important employment possibility between the harvests, now being the Xuân Thủy National Park Mushroom and service cooperation it also has an improved legal status. The grown mushrooms are sold in the surrounding communes and in Hanoi on the Long Biên-market and the South-market.[15] In case of the Honeybee Group the project’s aim was to structure previous activities of honey bee keeping. A group was created which now according to the National Park can work more effectively together, thereby increasing the number of bee cages and honey production and gaining a higher income.

The field of ecotourism still sees some difficulties since it is a new model in Vietnam and missing infrastructures are an obstacle for potential visitors. Now the Park has the plan to slowly upgrade facilities, services and marketing until the year 2025. Guest rooms are already available, three new big guest houses will be finished in 2011.[16]

Management

Until the year 2003, the park had a very poor management situation. There were only five staff members with limited technical and professional capacities. The given infrastructure and facilities were insufficient. Since institutional arrangements were unclear, the National Park was not able to implement monitoring activities which could have helped stopping over-exploitation quickly. Besides the overlapping management responsibilities there was a constant fight between local interest groups whose livelihoods depend on the natural resources, and the management board which wanted to decrease the high rate of exploitation. On governmental level there was a lack of coordination and cooperation to implement effective management mechanisms.[17]

Since 2003, the situation has improved. A new office including different function rooms and a natural museum was built and can now meet the given demand for infrastructural and technical capacities. On the level of human resources there were recruited more staff members from different professions such as tourism, forestry, aquaculture and biology. Now there are not only 20 people working in the office, the staff also participates regularly in workshops and training programs to improve there skills in fields of environmental education, ecotourism and community development.

The institutional level is still a challenge. As successful story can the project of co-managing clam culture be seen. Now, the Xuân Thủy National Park management board, local councils and clam farmers cooperate so that clams are harvested under control and responsibilities and rights of each side are clearly defined. The on-going task of strengthening its institutional capacity is very important for the National Park, for example there is still the need to know about the land use rights in the area to have basic information which then can be used to manage the given resources and activities. Since there are a lot of agencies and organizations which somehow have an influence on or responsibility for the Park, there is the need to organize and structure all the interests to keep a strict Park policy and avoid overlapping responsibilities which prevent the management board from succeeding with its plans.

At the moment, there is a wide range of responsible organizations: local governmental authorities, state agencies, the Xuân Thủy National Park Management Unit as a special agency, internal agencies like the [18]

References

Notes

  1. ^ Phan Nguyen Hong, Le Xuan Tuan & Phan Thi Anh Dao, Xuân Thủy National Park : Biodiversity, Hanoi, 2007, p.8.
  2. ^ Nguyen Duc Tu, Le Manh Hung, Le Trong Trai, Ha Quy Ouynh, Nguyen Quoc Binh and Thomas, R., Conservation of key coastal wetland sites in the Red River Delta: an assessment of IBAs 10 years on Hanoi: BirdLife International Vietnam Programme 2006, p. 15.
  3. ^ Phan Nguyen Hong, Le Xuan Tuan & Phan Thi Anh Dao, Xuân Thủy National Park: Biodiversity, MERC-MCD, Hanoi, Vietnam, 2007, p. 9.
  4. ^ Pham Dinh Viet Hong, Nguyen Duc Tu, Nguyen Viet Cach & Le Thanh Binh, Xuân Thủy National Park: Policy Brief, VEPA-MCD, Hanoi, Vietnam, 2007, p. 9.
  5. ^ Xuân Thủy National Park- A Destination of Eco-tourism, flyer of the National Park
  6. ^ Phan Nguyen Hong, Le Xuan Tuan & Phan Thi Anh Dao, Xuân Thủy National Park: Biodiversity, MERC-MCD, Hanoi, Vietnam, 2007, p. 9 ff.
  7. ^ Phan Nguyen Hong, Le Xuan Tuan & Phan Thi Anh Dao, Xuân Thủy National Park: Biodiversity, MERC-MCD, Hanoi, Vietnam, 2007, p. 19.
  8. ^ Phan Nguyen Hong, Le Xuan Tuan & Phan Thi Anh Dao, Xuân Thủy National Park: Biodiversity, MERC-MCD, Hanoi, Vietnam, 2007, p. 10.
  9. ^ The Ramsar Regional Center – East Asia Wise-Use Workshop and Training Session on Wetland Management 19 – 26 September 2009, Changnyeong, South Korea, p. 62.
  10. ^ Phan Thi Anh Dao, Phan Nguyen Hong, Le Xuan Tuan, Tran Minh Phuong & Nguyen Huu Tho, Xuân Thủy National Park: Socio-Economics, MERC-MCR, Hanoi, 2007, p. 7f.
  11. ^ Report on Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA), Project "Sustainable Resource Management in Xuân Thủy National Park", International Marinelife Alliance (IMA) – Vietnam and Project Management Unit Xuân Thủy National Park, Hanoi, 2004, p. 15ff.
  12. ^ Phan Thi Anh Dao, Phan Nguyen Hong, Le Xuan Tuan, Tran Minh Phuong & Nguyen Huu Tho, Xuân Thủy National Park: Socio-Economics, MERC-MCR, Hanoi, 2007, p. 11ff.
  13. ^ Phan Thi Anh Dao, Phan Nguyen Hong, Le Xuan Tuan, Tran Minh Phuong & Nguyen Huu Tho, Xuân Thủy National Park: Socio-Economics, MERC-MCR, Hanoi, 2007, p. 18ff.
  14. ^ Dinh Thi Phuong, Rhythm of Ramsar, Internal Bulletin of Xuân Thủy National Park, No. 01, Year 2010, Xuân Thủy, p.2.
  15. ^ Ngo Van Chieu, Rhythm of Ramsar, Internal Bulletin of Xuân Thủy National Park, No. 01, Year 2010, Xuân Thủy, p.3.
  16. ^ Tran Thi Trang, Rhythm of Ramsar, Internal Bulletin of Xuân Thủy National Park, No. 01, Year 2010, Xuân Thủy, p.4.
  17. ^ The Ramsar Regional Center – East Asia Wise-Use Workshop and Training Session on Wetland Management 19 – 26 September 2009, Changnyeong, South Korea, p. 60ff.
  18. ^ Pham Dinh Viet Hong, Nguyen Viet Cach, Le Thanh Binh & Nguyen Xuan Dung, Xuân Thủy National Park: Management, VEPA-MCD, Hanoi, 2007, p. 21ff.

Bibliography

  • The Ramsar Regional Center – East Asia Wise – Use Workshop and Training Session on Wetland Management 19 – 26 September 2009, Changnyeong, South Korea, p. 60 -64
  • Vuon Quoc Gia Xuân Thủy, CORiN-ASIA, The Wetlands Alliance, Sida, Building local capacities for sustainable resource management in Xuân Thủy National Park, Vietnam
  • Phan Thi Anh Dao, Phan Nguyen Hong, Le Xuan Tuan, Tran Minh Phuong & Nguyen Huu Tho, 2007, Xuân Thủy National Park: Socio-Economics, MERC-MCD, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • Phan Nguyen Hong, Le Xuan Tuan & Phan Thi Anh Dao, 2007, Xuân Thủy National Park: Biodiversity, MERC-MCD, Hanoi, Vietnam

External links

  • Website of Xuân Thủy National Park
  • complete list of birds by BirdLife Indochina
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 



Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.