World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Michigan Proposal 04-2

Article Id: WHEBN0008900149
Reproduction Date:

Title: Michigan Proposal 04-2  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: LGBT rights in Michigan, United States presidential election in Michigan, 2012, Michigan Womyn's Music Festival and transgender people, Michigan Womyn's Music Festival, Kansas Amendment 1
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Michigan Proposal 04-2

Michigan Proposal 04-2[1] of 2004, is an amendment to the Michigan Constitution that makes it unconstitutional for the state to recognize or perform same-sex marriages or civil unions. The referendum was approved by 59% of the voters.[2]

The text of the amendment states:

To secure and preserve the benefits of marriage for our society and for future generations of children, the union of one man and one woman in marriage shall be the only agreement recognized as a marriage or similar union for any purpose.[3]

In May 2008, the Michigan Supreme Court held that the amendment bans not only same-sex marriage and civil unions, but also public employee domestic partnership benefits such as health insurance.[4] The ruling however had little effect since most public employers, relaxed their eligibility criteria to not run afoul of the amendment[5]

On March 21, 2014, a federal judge ruled that Michigan's ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional and did not stay the ruling,[6] although the ruling was later suspended, until at least March 26, 2014, by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, in order to consider an appeal by the attorney general of Michigan.[7]


Proposal 04-2[8]
Choice Votes %
Referendum passed Yes 2,698,077 58.63
No 1,904,319 41.37
Total votes 4,602,396 100.00
Registered voters and turnout 7,263,024 63.36

See also


  1. ^ 2004 General Election Results, Michigan Department of State. Accessed 19 December 2006.
  2. ^ Election 2004 - Ballot Measures Accessed 30 November 2006.
  3. ^ Michigan State Constitution, Article I, section 25, Michigan Legislature. Accessed 19 December 2006.
  4. ^ National Pride at Work, Inc. v. Governor of Michigan 748 N.W.2d 524
  5. ^ "Ruling on same-sex benefits weighed". 2008-05-08. Retrieved 2013-11-02. 
  6. ^ White, Ed (March 21, 2014). "Judge strikes down Michigan's ban on gay marriage".  
  7. ^ Eligon, John; Eckholm, Erik (March 22, 2013). "For Gay Couples in Michigan, a Day of Joy Ends in Legal Uncertainty".  
  8. ^ "2004 General Election Turnout Rates". United States Election Project. June 4, 2013. 

External links

  • The Money Behind the 2004 Marriage Amendments -- National Institute on Money in State Politics
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.