World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Webster–Ashburton Treaty

Webster–Ashburton Treaty ratification.

The Webster–Ashburton Treaty, signed August 9, 1842, was a treaty resolving several border issues between the United States and the British North American colonies. Signed under John Tyler's presidency, it resolved the Aroostook War, a nonviolent dispute over the location of the MaineNew Brunswick border. It established the border between Lake Superior and the Lake of the Woods, originally defined in the Treaty of Paris (1783), reaffirmed the location of the border (at the 49th parallel) in the westward frontier up to the Rocky Mountains defined in the Treaty of 1818, defined seven crimes subject to extradition, called for a final end to the slave trade on the high seas, and agreed to shared use of the Great Lakes.

The treaty was signed by United States Secretary of State Daniel Webster and British diplomat Alexander Baring, 1st Baron Ashburton.[1]


  • In the East 1
  • In the West 2
  • Other issues 3
  • Results 4
  • See also 5
  • Notes and references 6
  • Works cited and further reading 7
  • External links 8

In the East

Settlement in the East

The treaty incorporated a geographic oddity. Since "Fort Blunder", an unnamed U.S. fort in what is now part of northeastern New York, had been inadvertently constructed on Canadian soil, the northern border of New York between the Saint Lawrence River and the New York–Vermont line was adjusted 3/4 of a mile northward, beyond the 45th parallel, to incorporate the half-finished and abandoned fort on US soil. Following the signing of the treaty, construction was resumed on the site. The new project replaced the aborted 1812-era construction with a massive third-system masonry fortification known as Fort Montgomery.[1]

This treaty marked the end of local confrontations between lumberjacks (known as the Aroostook War) along the Maine border with the Canadian provinces of Quebec and New Brunswick. It also resolved issues that had led to the Indian Stream dispute as well as the Caroline Affair. The border was fixed with the disputed territory divided between the two nations. The British acquired the Halifax-Quebec road route their military desired because it gave a wintertime connection from Quebec to New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. Portions of the US-Canada border were adjusted so as to give the U.S. a little more land to the north. The Webster–Ashburton Treaty failed to clarify ownership of Machias Seal Island and nearby North Rock, which remain in dispute today.[1] Additionally, the signing of the treaty put an end to several building improvements planned for Upper Canadian defense forts such as Fort Malden in Amherstburg, which as a result was later abandoned by the British government when it no longer served a defense purpose.

In the West

Plaque in Washington, D.C..

The border between Lake Superior and the Lake of the Woods needed clarification because the faulty Mitchell Map used in the negotiations for the Treaty of Paris was inadequate to define the border according to the terms of that treaty. The ambiguity in the map and treaty resulted in Minnesota's Arrowhead region being disputed, and previous negotiations had not resolved the question. The treaty speaks of the border passing through "Long Lake", the location of which was unstated,[2] but the map showed the lake flowing out into Lake Superior near Isle Royale, which is consistent with the Pigeon River route.

The British, however, had previously taken the position that the border should leave Lake Superior at Fond du Lac (the "head of the lake") in modern Duluth, Minnesota, proceed up the Saint Louis and Embarrass rivers, across the height of land, and down Pike River and Lake Vermilion to the Rainy River.[3][4]

To counter this western route, the U.S. advocated for an eastern route, used by early French explorer Jacques de Noyon in 1688, and the later a well-used fur traders' route after 1802. This way headed north from the lake at the site of Fort William up the Kaministiquia and Dog Rivers to Cold Water Lake, crossed the divide by Prairie Portage to Height of Land Lake, then went west by way of the Savanne, Pickerel, and Maligne rivers to Lake La Croix, where it joined the present border.[5]

The Mitchell map had shown both of those routes, and also showed the "Long Lake" route between them.[6] Long Lake was thought to be the Pigeon River (despite the absence of a lake at its mouth).[7]

The traditional traders' route left the Lake at Grand Portage and went overland to the Pigeon, up that river and a tributary across the Height of Land Portage, and thence down tributaries of the Rainy River to Lac La Croix, Rainy Lake and River, and Lake of the Woods. This is finally the route which was designated as the border in the treaty.[8]

Another clarification made in this treaty resulted in clarifying the anomaly of the Northwest Angle. Again, due to errors on the Mitchell Map, Treaty of Paris reads "... through the Lake of the Woods to the most northwesternmost point thereof, and from thence on a due west course to the river Mississippi ..." The Anglo-American Convention of 1818 defined the boundary about Lake of the Woods to the Rocky Mountains.

This 1842 treaty reaffirmed the border and further defined it by modifying the border definition to instead read as

"... at the Chaudiere Falls, from which the Commissioners traced the line to the most northwestern point of the Lake of the Woods, thence, along the said line to the said most northwestern point, being in latitude 49°23′55″ north, and in longitude 95°14′38″ west from the Observatory at Greenwich; thence, according to existing treaties, due south to its intersection with the 49th parallel of north latitude, and along that parallel to the Rocky Mountains ..."

The Webster–Ashburton Treaty failed to deal with the Oregon question, although the issue was discussed in negotiations.

Other issues

Article 10 of the Webster–Ashburton Treaty identified seven crimes subject to extradition: "murder, or assault with intent to commit murder, or piracy, or arson, or robbery, or forgery, or the utterance of forged paper." It did not include slave revolt or mutiny. In addition, the United States did not press for the return or extradition of an estimated 12,000 fugitive slaves who had reached Canada.[9]

While agreeing to call for a final end to the slave trade on the high seas, Webster and Ashburton agreed to pass over the Creole case of 1841 in the Caribbean, which was then in contention. In November 1841, a slave revolt on the American brig Creole, part of the coastwise slave trade, had forced the ship to Nassau. Bahama officials eventually emancipated all 128 slaves who chose to stay in Nassau, as Britain had abolished slavery in its colonies, effective in 1834.[9] The U.S. initially demanded return of the slaves, then compensation. A settlement was made in 1855 as part of a much larger claims treaty of 1853, covering claims by both nations to 1814.


As a result of the Webster–Ashburton Treaty, the United States ceded 5,000 square miles (13,000 km2) of disputed territory along the Maine border, including the Halifax–Quebec Route, but kept 7,000 square miles (18,000 km2) of the disputed wilderness.[10] In addition, the United States received 6,500 square miles (17,000 km2) of land along the Minnesota-Canada border, which included the Mesabi Range.[10] Shortly after ratification of the Webster–Ashburton treaty, the Ojibwa nations about the south shore of Lake Superior ceded land to the United States in the Treaty of La Pointe. However, the news of the ratification of the international treaty did not reach either of the parties negotiating the land cession. The Grand Portage Band was mistakenly omitted from the Ojibwe treaty council. In addition, the Grand Portage Band was misinformed on the details of the Treaty of Paris; they believed that the border passed through the center of Lake Superior to the Saint Louis River, placing both Isle Royale and their band in British territory. The Treaty of Paris specifically notes Isle Royale to be in the territories of the United States. Consequently, the Isle Royale Agreement was signed between the United States and the Grand Portage Band in 1844 as an adhesion to the Treaty of La Pointe, with other Ojibwa tribes reaffirming the treaty.

Ten months of negotiations for the treaty were held largely at the Ashburton House, home of the British legation on Lafayette Square in Washington, D.C. The house has been designated a U.S. National Historic Landmark.

In order to make the controversial treaty more popular in the United States, Webster released a map of the Maine-Canada border, which he claimed had been drawn by Benjamin Franklin. It showed British ownership at the time of the area the United States claimed and largely received under the Treaty.

See also

Notes and references

  1. ^ a b c Carroll (2001).
  2. ^ Lass (1980), pp. 1, 11, 37.
  3. ^ Lass (1980), pp. 37–39, 49.
  4. ^ Vogel & Stanley (1992), pp. E-12, E-13.
  5. ^ Lass (1980), pp. 37–39, 44.
  6. ^ Lass (1980), p. 37.
  7. ^ On the La Vérendrye Map, series of lakes are shown, of which "Lac de Sesakinaga" (Saganaga Lake), a Height of Land, "Lac Plat", "Lac Long" and Grand Portage are shown in relative equidistance from each other, thus alluding to Mountain Lake or Arrow Lake as "Lac Long", all long lakes on the Pigeon River route.
  8. ^ "Webster-Ashburton Treaty, Art. 2". Yale Law School. 1842. Retrieved September 18, 2008. 
  9. ^ a b Jones (1975a), pp. 28–50.
  10. ^ a b Kennedy, Bailey & Cohen (2006), pp. 374, 375.

Works cited and further reading

  • Carroll, Francis M. (March 1997). "The Passionate Canadians: The Historical Debate about the Eastern Canadian-American Boundary". New England Quarterly . 70 (1): 83–101.  
  • ——— (2001). A Good and Wise Measure: The Search for the Canadian-American Boundary, 1783–1842. University of Toronto Press.  (the standard scholarly history)
  • ——— (2003). "Drawing the Line". Beaver 83 (4): 19–25. 
  • Corey, Albert B. (1941). The Crisis of 1830–1842 in Canadian-American Relations. 
  • Jones, Howard (March 1975a). "The Peculiar Institution and National Honor: The Case of the Creole Slave Revolt". Civil War History 21 (1): 28–50. 
  • ——— (December 1975b). "Anglophobia and the Aroostook War". New England Quarterly 48 (4): 519–539.  
  • ——— (1977). To the Webster–Ashburton Treaty: A Study in Anglo-American Relations, 1783–1843. 
  • Jones, Wilbur Devereux (February 1956). "The Influence of Slavery on the Webster–Ashburton Negotiations". Journal of Southern History 22 (1): 48–58.  
  • Kennedy, David M.; Bailey, Thomas Andrew & Cohen, Lizabeth (2006). The American Pageant (13th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.  
  • Lass, William E. (1980). Minnesota's Boundary with Canada. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Historical Society.  
  • LeDuc, Thomas (December 1964). "The Webster–Ashburton Treaty and the Minnesota Iron Ranges". Journal of American History 51 (3): 476–481.   (shows the value of the iron range was not known when the treaty was drawn)
  • Merk, Frederick (December 1956). "The Oregon Question in the Webster–Ashburton Negotiations". Mississippi Valley Historical Review 43 (3): 379–404.  
  • Remini, Robert (1997). Daniel Webster. pp. 535–64. 
  • Vogel, Robert C. & Stanley, David G. (1992). "Portage Trails in Minnesota, 1630s–1870s" (PDF) (Multiple Property Documentation Form).  
  • The Maine Council (1904). Historical Sketch Roster of Commissioned Officers and Enlisted Men Called Into Service for the Protection of the Northeastern Frontier of Maine from February to May 1839. Augusta, ME: Kennebec Journal Print. pp. 4–5. Retrieved October 15, 2007 – via Google Books. 

External links

  • Text of the Webster-Ashburton Treaty (The Avalon Project at Yale Law School)
  • Webster-Ashburton Treaty (U.S. Department of State)
  • Franklin Map Possibly Forged
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.